Province announces record-breaking investments in physicians as editorial questions use of 'treason'

British Columbia Premier David Eby called Alberta separatists who travelled to Washington "traitors," and the article notes that Section 46 of the Criminal Code ties treason to use of force or violence rather than non-violent political advocacy.

British Columbia Premier David Eby described Alberta separatists who travelled to Washington as "traitors." That choice of words has prompted discussion about what treason means under Canadian law. Section 46 of the Criminal Code is cited as defining treason to involve force, violence, or aiding enemies. The piece recalls the October Crisis of 1970 as an example of conduct the law was written to address. Key points: - Premier David Eby called Alberta separatists who travelled to Washington "traitors." - Section 46 of the Criminal Code is described as linking treason to use of force or violence to overthrow a government, and to assisting enemies or communicating with foreign powers. - The article cites the 1970 October Crisis, including kidnappings and the murder of Pierre Laporte, as historical conduct that met that description. - The author argues that applying the term "treason" to non-violent political actions risks dulling its legal meaning and can undermine public trust in leaders. Summary: The article emphasizes a distinction between dissent and violent insurrection, and it warns that stretching the word "treason" for partisan effect can weaken its legal and civic significance. Undetermined at this time.